There is, without a doubt, a serious problem with illegal immigration, especially coming in from Mexico. The workers and other Mexican civilians coming here looking for jobs are causing problems, along with any children they may have here, especially in terms of business competition and welfare funds, but the real problem lies with the foreign criminals. Gang members and human smugglers slide with ease between the cracks of the permeable barrier that we like to call the US-Mexico border; crime bosses, like Maria Leon, are also able to travel between the two countries. Coyotes force illegal immigrants to go to extremes, including selling drugs and committing theft, in order to get paid. Earlier this year, an Arizona rancher was most likely killed by a drug scout or Coyote from Mexico. With much of Northern Mexico run by drug lords, and littered human smuggling outfits and gang members, there are many obstacles to preventing illegal immigration. The first dilemma is that it is against the interests of criminals and workers alike. Immigration reform will inevitably cause smugglers to become more creative and drug lords more brutal. And as the condition worsens in Mexico, workers will become more desperate and try any way possible to leave the country. This predicament at the border is viewed by many as a failure of the federal government’s immigration policy.
In response to this policy failure, Arizona enacted a draconian immigration bill that would have provided new methods to law enforcement, allowing them to deter at least some illegal immigration. Rhode Island also followed suit, enacting an immigration law of its own. Idaho, Utah, Missouri, Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Maryland, Minnesota, and Colorado are all considering adding stricter immigration statutes to their state laws. Now, I must say that I applaud their efforts, but it is not their place to create laws concerning immigration. It is because of this that the Obama administration has sued Arizona and is seeking an injunction in order to stop SB 1070 (the controversial immigration law) from going into effect. The Justice Department feels that, “The law impedes the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of federal law and foreign policy.” It argued that, “In our constitutional system, the federal government has preeminent authority to regulate immigration matters. This authority derives from the United States Constitution and numerous acts of Congress.” The Departments of Homeland Security, Justice, and State also play a role in immigration matters. Because the Arizona bill does not fall into accordance with Federal Immigration Policy, it technically violates the Supremacy Clause, which makes it invalid.
Localities are also prohibited from making immigration laws, which Hazleton, PA learned recently after a federal appellate court informed them of the rule after overturning the town’s new immigration law. Sadly, the mayor of Hazleton was correct when he said, “The problem is that the federal government refuses to regulate the immigration problems that we're having in Hazleton and yet tells us that we can't defend ourselves.” However, it shouldn’t be surprising that the federal government has failed to protect American citizens from foreign threats, as it cannot even protect us from domestic ones; i.e. Janet Reno and Ted Kennedy.
It is for the reasons discussed above that I propose a federal immigration policy overhaul. The Obama administration’s immigration policy is about as great as their handling of the economy, social security, and healthcare, so immigration reform is definitely necessary at the federal level (But to be fair to the Democrats, it is hard to crack down on illegal immigration while leading a vigorous crusade against unborn fetuses). One idea for “reform” is the recently proposed DeMint-Vitter Amendment, which would create a loophole around federal supremacy by, “prohibiting President Obama’s administration, including the Department of Justice and other agencies, from participating in lawsuits seeking to invalidate the recently enacted Arizona immigration law.” The proposed amendment is a good idea, with good intentions, as Senator DeMint underscored when he stated, “States like Arizona shouldn't be prosecuted for protecting their citizens when the federal government fails to do so.” I believe that if we want true federal immigration reform, summer ROTC internships in border towns and a stronger National Guard (the name says it all) presence is the way to go.
With careful consideration of the dilemmas before us,
Adam J Ondo
Endnote: Information retrieved from FOX news network and the official Complaint filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Arizona.
*Please note the views or opinions expressed in articles on the College Republicans blog site are not endorsed or representative of the official club. This site is designed to allow conservative writers to share their thoughts on a variety of important issues facing the nation.